Global warming is causing increased issues for the poultry industry. Heat stress occurs earlier in the season and is expanding geographically. Ambient temperatures continue to climb to new highs and due to the absence of sweat glands, birds cannot efficiently regulate body heat. One of the primary reactions to heat exposure, which can occur as of 25°C1, is reduced feed intake in an effort to reduce metabolic heat production, resulting in decreased growth. Heat stress (HS) adversely affects the physiological status, immunity, reproductive performance, feed efficiency and egg production of birds. This automatically leads to substantial economic losses. One study found the total financial impact for the US poultry sector to be at an estimated 128 million$ a year2 whereas French research showed that about 7% of total losses were caused by heat stress in the French livestock industry3. In China heat stress significantly contributes to the $2.7 billion in losses recorded in poultry livestock. The European summer thermal waves caused roughly four million mortalities in broilers4. Strategies, especially dietary preventive ones, to deal with heat stress are thus crucial to safeguard business profitability.
There is extensive research to demonstrate the benefit of nutrient absorption enhancers in traditional broiler diets with moderate to high levels of added fat. The enhanced digestion and absorption of nutrients has been widely shown to allow substantial diet reformulation and offer significant feed cost savings. However, increasingly we are seeing the use of diets with little, or no added oil are becoming more common, so what is the benefit of nutrient absorption enhancers in diets without added fat?
Chickens subject to heat stress, must preserve a thermal balance between their internal metabolic heat production and body heat loss to the environment. Only if the core body temperature of the bird remains under control, can optimum growth and feed conversion be achieved. The heat production of birds depends on the digestion of feed. Feeding an optimal digestible ration requires significantly less energy for the birds to digest and utilise, compared to that of a poorly digestible formulation. Additionally, the digestion of certain nutrients generates less body heat (heat increment) than others. For example, lipids produce significantly less heat per calorie of feed energy while being digested, compared to proteins. Additionally, protein turnover accounts for 9 to 12% of basal energy expenditure whereas in contrast, fat turnover only accounts for 2 to 4% because of its lower turnover rate (Baldwin et al., 1980). Hence, increasing the fat content of the diet (whilst maintaining the same total dietary energy level) helps to reduce body heat produced.
Table 1 – Energy values of starch, crude protein, and crude fat according to energy systems and generation of body heat (Noblet, J. and Van Milgen, J., 2004.)
In parenthesis, energy values as percentage of starch. Crude protein and crude fat are assumed to be 90 % digestible; the starch is 100 % digestible.
Therefore, it is necessary to adjust the feed formulation during heat stress, to ensure maximum digestibility and optimal supply of all essential nutrients, controlling the incremental heat production, ultimately providing the best support for maximum bird performance.
© Kemin Industries, Inc. and its group of companies 2024 all rights reserved. ® ™ Trademarks of Kemin Industries, Inc., USA
Certain statements may not be applicable in all geographical regions. Product labeling and associated claims may differ based upon government requirements.